Editorial, Sourcing and AI Policy

A factual claim should be supported by an appropriate source when the source is material to a reader's decision. First-party evidence is preferred for claims about Infusible Coder activity. Technical and industry claims should use relevant primary or authoritative material where practical, and links should point readers to the original context rather than a search result.

A short social post supports only what can be directly observed or responsibly described from that post. It should not be stretched into an undocumented curriculum, identity, outcome, partnership, employment claim, or current schedule. Opinion and practical guidance should be distinguishable from a verified business fact.

Content may use AI assistance for research organisation, drafting, editing, summarisation, or quality checks. AI-assisted text requires human review before publication. Review should check the page's purpose, sources, names, dates, links, internal consistency, unsupported claims, and whether the final wording accurately represents the available evidence.

Human review reduces risk but does not guarantee that every page is complete, error-free, or current. AI output can be wrong or overconfident, and human editors can also miss context. Readers should follow cited sources and confirm time-sensitive operational details directly.

Editors should avoid presenting generated wording as a source. When AI assistance helps locate or organise material, the underlying evidence still needs to be opened, checked, and represented accurately. Uncertainty should remain visible instead of being replaced with confident language.

Material changes should update the page's displayed date where the template supports it. When a correction substantially changes meaning, the page should identify the corrected point or otherwise make the change understandable. Minor spelling, formatting, and broken-link repairs may be made without a detailed correction note.

Older pages can remain useful while some details become outdated. No guarantee of completeness or currentness is made. Readers can use the corrections and complaints route to identify a specific concern, preferably with the page address, questioned wording, and supporting evidence.